In a world racing to bring humanoid robots into our homes, 1X’s latest creation, NEO, promised to be the next big leap—a $20,000 “AI-powered” home assistant capable of folding laundry, stacking dishes, and maybe even offering companionship. But when the glossy marketing videos met the reality of tele-operated demos, the internet’s fascination quickly turned into skepticism, satire, and memes.
The Dream of an AI Roommate Turns Awkward
When Palo Alto–based startup 1X unveiled NEO this week, the initial reaction was electric. The humanoid robot’s design was sleek, futuristic, and full of promise. Early videos suggested that it could tidy up, organize your shelves, and learn from your habits. But when journalist Joanna Stern from The Wall Street Journal tested NEO in person, the dream began to wobble.
Every task—from fetching a water bottle to loading a dishwasher—was painfully slow, sometimes taking minutes for the simplest action. And more crucially, NEO wasn’t acting on its own. Behind the scenes, a human operator wearing a VR headset was controlling its every move. What was marketed as an intelligent, autonomous home robot turned out to be, at least for now, a remote-controlled experiment in progress.
Experts Warn: The Humanoid Hype Cycle Is Repeating
The reveal reignited a familiar debate about overpromising and underdelivering in AI robotics.
“There’s a lot of irrational exuberance around this technology,” said Ken Goldberg, a robotics professor at UC Berkeley. “It’s frustrating because launching a product like this prematurely risks eroding public confidence in robotics altogether.”
Goldberg and other experts worry that companies chasing early hype could set the field back, creating disillusionment when expectations aren’t met. The real challenge, they argue, isn’t in creating humanoid bodies—it’s building trustworthy, safe, and useful AI brains to power them.
A Price Tag That Raises Eyebrows—and Privacy Concerns
At $20,000 or $499 per month, NEO doesn’t come cheap. Yet even the financial details have left potential buyers uncertain. Attorney Marc Hoag analyzed the preorder terms and found multiple red flags: the $200 reservation fee doesn’t guarantee a final price, subscription length, or even a cancellation policy. “It’s probably too good to be true,” he wrote, adding that transparency was missing from 1X’s offer.
But the bigger concern is what happens after NEO moves into your home. According to 1X’s CEO Bernt Børnich, users must agree to data collection from the robot’s cameras and sensors to “help improve its abilities.” The company claims this data will be anonymized and people in view will be blurred, but critics aren’t convinced.
AI researcher Gary Marcus called it “the next step in surveillance capitalism,” warning that home robots could become Trojan horses for personal data. “The productivity gains are negligible compared to the privacy risks,” Marcus said. “It’s another way to gather intimate data under the guise of innovation.”
From Promised Helper to Internet Meme
Within hours of NEO’s reveal, the robot became an online meme sensation. Social media users joked about its “tele-operated” nature, with viral posts suggesting that paying $20,000 essentially gives a stranger in a VR headset access to your home. Some memes went further, humorously depicting the robot in bizarre household scenarios—underscoring the absurdity of the situation.
Reddit users were less forgiving. One commenter called the demo “a cold shower after the promo,” noting that NEO couldn’t perform a single task autonomously. Another warned that home robots present real safety risks: “A robot could accidentally turn on the oven, drop a knife, or fall on a pet. The list of potential hazards is endless.”
Learning, Not Earning—For Now
Despite the backlash, Stern offered a more balanced view in her review. Spending a day with NEO, she said, was “like spending the day with a toddler.” The robot was clumsy, curious, and clearly still learning. “The next few years aren’t about owning a super-useful robot,” she concluded, “but about raising one—training it to understand your world, even at the cost of your privacy.”
For some in the tech community, that perspective is fair. Gavin Purcell, co-creator of the AI for Humans podcast, urged patience: “This isn’t crapping on it—it’s just that this stuff is hard.” The road to a truly capable home robot, he said, will be long and full of trial and error.
The Fine Line Between Innovation and Illusion
Even 1X’s leadership seems aware of the delicate balance between ambition and acceptance. CEO Børnich describes the data-sharing agreement as part of what he calls the “Big Brother, Big Sister principle.” “Big Sister helps you; Big Brother monitors you,” he said. “We’re very much the Big Sister. The more data you share, the more useful we can be.”
But as critics point out, that’s exactly what makes consumers uneasy. For NEO to truly succeed, it must not only learn to tidy up homes but also clean up the public perception of what “AI-powered” really means.
Outlook
1X’s NEO is undeniably a technological marvel in design and ambition—but its launch highlights a growing gap between AI promise and AI performance. For now, NEO is less of a self-sufficient butler and more of a glimpse into the messy adolescence of home robotics.
In the race to humanize AI, 1X may have taken a bold first step—but until NEO learns to walk on its own, both literally and figuratively, the humanoid dream will remain just that: a dream wrapped in silicon, sensors, and a healthy dose of skepticism.
Discover more articles at Reliance Jio Partners with Google to Offer Free Google AI Pro Plan for 18 Months